For those who missed them, the files were published at the announced URL: http://oami.europa.eu/CTMOnline/RequestManager/en_Detail_NoReg?deno=&idappli=1152038&transition=ResultsDetailed I'm attaching them for your convenience as published on the website.
Nemo
John Vandenberg, 26/09/2013 16:23:
Hi,
Further to our announcement on September 21, the opposition has been formally filed before the European Union’s Office of Harmonization for the Internal Market (OHIM) on September 25. You can read the opposition filing in the documents section of the EU trademark application[1].
Additionally, an opposition observation has been filed but it is not yet available to the public at the URL mentioned above; our limited understanding is that it will be published there in the coming days. We’ll keep everyone informed on this aspect.
So what is next?
The OHIM will now review the Notice of Opposition to determine that the opposition is admissible. This takes a few weeks. If the notice of opposition is found to be admissible, the 'cooling-off period' commences.[2]
The 'cooling-off period' allows the parties can either negotiate an agreement, and either party may withdraw their claim to the mark without incurring additional costs. This period lasts between two months and two years. It is important that everyone understands that there is no need to act hastily. If the WMF and community need time to find the right solution, we will have two years.
The WMF set the timetable by applying for this trademark, and they have not withdrawn that application or responded appropriately to community calls for this to be re-evaluated. The WMF was informed in March that we viewed the trademark registration as unacceptable. Even after our announcement on September 21, the WMF has not addressed the heart of the issue; they have chosen to focus the community attention on a new approach, a collective trademark, rather than consider the erosion of the Commons by their trademarking of a public domain logo against the intentions of the author of the logo.
Contrary to the WMF’s claims on their ‘Request for consultation’[3], we have never said that the opposition needed to be filed on September 23. We are aware that we could have delayed the opposition until December. As the opposition process is able to proceed through the non-adversarial phase for two years, we believe it is appropriate that a properly focused formal process should commence now.
During the first two months of the cooling-off period, we request that the WMF provides a brief to the community explaining why they believe they have a legal claim to the community logo, given that the board knew it was selected in order that the community did not need to request authorisation.[4]
We also encourage the WMF to publish their research on collective trademarks, so that the community can make an informed decision about the utility of this approach. It is our understanding that, in the EU at least, the WMF will need to abandon their current trademark registration if they are to apply for a collective trademark.
Regards, John Vandenberg
== References ==
- [1] http://oami.europa.eu/CTMOnline/RequestManager/en_Detail_NoReg?deno=&ida...
- [2] http://oami.europa.eu/ows/rw/pages/CTM/regProcess/opposition.en.do
- [3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Logo/Request_for_consultation#Note...
- [4] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-September/045702.htm...
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe