I mean Wikipedia (or websites like Wikipedia) specific. Italian text will have to do - Google translate does miracles :) I think what would be really great is a set of statements/suggestions, so not just by one expert. For one, the Rodotà statement was not exactly what I was looking for at some point, so perhaps another statement by someone else clarifies better.
Thanks a lot,
Lodewijk
No dia 6 de Outubro de 2011 15:20, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.comescreveu:
Lodewijk, 06/10/2011 14:24:
No dia 6 de Outubro de 2011 14:01, Federico Leva (Nemo) escreveu:
This doesn't mean that we've misinformed users: prominent jurists agree that the proposed law is absolutely crazy for Wikipedia and other websites; and the community had discussed and assessed the effects of the proposed law for a long time before.
it's not that I dont trust you - but several people have asked me for
such
opinions. Is there somewhere an overview of legal experts interpreting this?
Yes, there are some, but do you mean for websites in general or for Wikipedia specifically? Are Italian texts enough? I've linked only a statement by Rodotà before because I can't imagine a more authoritative one now (I'm open to suggestions), but WMI is now asking more thorough analysis to legal experts.
Nemo
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l