On 2 March 2014 08:55, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 March 2014 02:01, Mark delirium@hackish.org wrote:
I personally would welcome more attention to our actual mission,
producing
free content, rather than the mission some of our members seem to be
engaged
in, "making the *.wikipedia.org sites look nice in the short term, even
if
nobody external can reuse the content".
You're seriously characterising the present dispute as this?
Its a pretty accurate description. What do you think the law says?