To end poverty, you can not just employ all who are poor, think that its 18% are managers, how many of the readers are in a precarious situation? This is one of the reasons I think this is bad focus, increasingly away from a social vision and increasingly commercial with its unique product, the Wikipedia...
"Imagine a world in which *every single human being* can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment."
Bullshit, every human with money to buy a pc and have access to internet, and capable to donate. That's WMF commitment.
On 25 October 2012 03:46, James Salsman jsalsman@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm not going to go into detail about how I arrived at the 18% figure for enwiki admins under the poverty line until the accusation that I violated the Privacy Policy is withdrawn or my questions about it are addressed. I am confident that it's accurate within a few percent. Instead of criticizing my spelling, I think it would be better if Foundation officials determined the figure for themselves.
It is sad that those who are very well off are so quick to exclude the possibility of helping impoverished long term contributors.
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l