I wonder which would be harder, trying to start the first new project in
years, or trying to get the English Wikipedia to make a significant
policy change?
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
On 2/27/2010 12:40 PM, David Goodman wrote:
> WP contains many of the essential elements of an almanac already, and
> could very easily cover all the rest-- it doesn't take a new project, just a
> relaxation of some of the self-imposed strictures. Relaxing, without
> eliminating , NOT NEWS , NOT DIRECTORY, and NOT INDISCRIMINATE . there's
> only one point that would need actual removal: NOT INDISCRIMINATE point 3,
> Excessive listing of statistics.
>
> The basic change could be accomplished by doing just that one
> deletion--there is not need for another project, or even another space for
> data.
>
> David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Casey Brown
lists@caseybrown.org wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Tyler
programmer651@comcast.net wrote:
>>> I was just wondering, how would you like to start an almanac, guys? That
>> would be neat, a wiki almanac.
>>>
>>
>>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_new_projects :-)
>>
>> --
>> Casey Brown
>> Cbrown1023
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>