Expect big changes in the next 24 months on internet copyright and usage in the United States Congress and Senate. Congress has been getting too many people complaining. One sad note is that Slashdot is no longer "news for geeks" but "news for hackers, and software pirates". The pendulum is starting to swing back the other way and unfortunately, it may swing too far to the right. Experimental internet IP litigation is where WE DO NOT WANT TO BE in the line of fire.
Anything folks can do to limit our exposure here is a good thing. For the most part, WMF and its policies err on the side of caution, and this is a very good thing. The more prudent we can be in this area, the better. There's just been too much abuse of the current copyright laws by the internet community as a whole.
:-)
Jeff
John Barberio wrote:
Hi,
Over on Wikipedia, there's a significant group of editors who've decided that current copyright policy doesn't go far enought, and are rewriting the external linking guidelines to require 'copyright verification' and 'due care to verify copyright' on external links. This is because they feel we are risking threat of suit due to linking to the likes of YouTube.
No, I'm not suggesting we should allow links to copyvio, it's clear that we shouldn't. But it's my understanding that the proposed changes would be poor ones to make for various reasons.
Primarily because we don't have the resources to take 'due care' and 'verify copyright'. True copyright verification needing lawyers time and money, it's not something that's in our grasp at all.
At the moment, copyright policy says not to 'knowingly and intentionally' link to violations of copyright. And I believe this is pretty much the best standard we can claim without introducing unattainable burdens.
Additionally, my lay understanding of the legal implications is that claiming we can and do verify copyright status of external links may well open us up to liability rather than reduce it.
I've tried to explain this in discussion, but the discussion has gotten a bit overheated. It appears no one is going to calm down over this until there's a clarification of copyright policy by the foundation.
I hope this can be clarified by the foundation.
- John
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l