Anthony DiPierro wrote:
On 6/3/06, Angela beesley@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at the recent changes to the foundation wiki, I see http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution_President, affirming you as President and authorizing you to make certain decisions, "failed to gain Board support". I wonder: Who proposed that resolution? Who voted for it? Who voted against it?
This hasn't yet been voted on. It doesn't even have a Motion to Vote yet. I've no idea why it would be regarded as rejected.
Angela.
It's cute calling an organization "transparent" when even the board members don't even know whether a resolution has been rejected.
I rest my case. Anthony is not being serious here, he is trolling.
There is a legitimate question as to what to call a resolution which was never voted upon, because no one ever made a motion that it be voted on, because it was in preliminary drafting stages. Was it rejected? Was it never really proposed? That is what Angela is talking about.
Spinning this into some kind of lack of transparency is just... well, it is Anthony. Nonsense.
--Jimbo