GerardM gerard.meijssen@gmail.com writes:
Hoi, People from Moldovan and Romania are partisan to this conflict. From a language point of view the political arguments are irrelevant. It is wrong to insist that this is vote is acceptable. It is also wrong to eventually say there is a consensus.
[...]
I'm not judging whether a vote is or is not acceptable (apart from the fact that in the face of continued inaction on the side of the BoT, it may be the only way to overcome an intolerable situation, as seen with the "Siberian" exercise). However, what I clearly find inacceptable is your attempt to exlude all those directly concerned from having their say, i.e. the native speakers of the language in question.
I repeat: When I read through the discussions I haven't spotted a single voice by a Romanian/Moldavian native speaker in favour of a mo.wiki. At the same time there was unanimous support for closing it and differing opinions on whether or not a multi-script interface for ro.wiki would be a good thing.
I haven't read any statement saying e.g.: "I am Moldovan speaker from Tiraspol and I need/would like to have a Cyrillic interface/a separate mo.wiki." Maybe I've overlooked something, but I don't think so.
So please, can you explain where you see the community which in your view needs the continued existance of mo.wikipeda? Do you have any intelligence regarding Wikipedia users on the eastern bank of the Dniester? And if they exist, why didn't they make their voices heard at any point during the disussion?
Thanks,
Johannes