Well yeah Milos - but we probably won't - will we! - Seems a bit silly.
I was hoping we could have a thread about the principle of discussing / evaluating some of the various voluntary codes of conduct out there - perhaps someone is aware of a US standard (is that what you're getting at, Geni - that the location of the servers is probably the most important factor?)
cheers,
Peter, PM.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:21 AM, genigeniice@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/7 private musings thepmaccount@gmail.com:
Hi all,
Just wondering what folk think about the WMF heading towards compliance
with
things like this;
http://www.gsmeurope.org/documents/eu_codes/fsm_code_en.pdf
This is a german code of conduct - but there are many more (I've also
spoken
with these chaps =- http://www.iia.net.au/ - and I got the feeling that they'd very much like to engage with both communities, and the
foundation as
the 'service provider')
My interest stems from discussing sexual content on wikimedia foundation projects, but obviously engagement with such external bodies / codes of practice etc. is far from limited to that sphere,
best,
Peter, PM.
Is based on German law so no. There are rather a lot of other flaws but that one is a complete killer.
We may consider to use Saudi Arabia and North Korea laws, too.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l