Erik Moeller wrote:
b) a link to an alternative online copy which is freely accessible and conforms with the license and includes a list a list of all authors,
What is the purpose of the wording "and includes a list a list of all authors," ?
Doesn't that preclude people from applying the same understanding of what "reasonable" attribution is, that the text seems to require of wikimedia itself (I am not commenting on whether it is reasonable at this point, just on the fact that you seem to with this wording be requiring a full list of all authors in addition to linking in the same form you would link to wikimedia.
I could understand that this would make people prefer to link to wikipedia rather than a site for which you are claiming a more strong attribution form would be required. But I am unclear on what the thinking is behind this, so perhaps not best to speculate. Can you clarify?
To me philosophically (I will need to think about the ramifications more deeply before I can offer even a thoughtful layman's opinion on the matter), it seems to at the very least go against the spirit of the "share-alike" part of the license.
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen