Dear Jan-Bart, Unfortunately the exact wordings was "I'll point out also that there are zero real-world implications for the survey results".
Because we all agree that there is now such thing like a zero real-world impact survey, we really hope that the raw results of this survey will be made as public as possible (privacy issue), and that in the future , survey including question about WMF partners (chapters are not the only ones) will be done since the very beginning in collaboration with all the partners involved.
sincerely
Charles
___________________________________________________________ Charles ANDRES, Chairman "Wikimedia CH" – Association for the advancement of free knowledge – www.wikimedia.ch Skype: charles.andres.wmch IRC://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia-ch
Le 12 sept. 2012 à 16:14, Jan-Bart de Vreede jdevreede@wikimedia.org a écrit :
Hey
So I might have missed some mails on this thread (perhaps because they were not posted on this public list) but I highly doubt that Sue perform surveys that do not have a real-world impact on our operations. I know that the results of the previous surveys were used in several discussions (including at a board level) in order to provide more insight….
On the other hand, using these surveys to gain more insight is not the same as using them to "hold each other accountable" which is sometimes easy to do. Every survey (and questions) has a lots of interpretation magic which can easily lead you astray, but I don't have to tell you (the community) this :)
Jan-Bart
On 10 Sep 2012, at 23:01, Delphine Ménard notafishz@gmail.com wrote:
Contrarily to Sue, I do think that these surveys (should) have a real-world impact and (should) keep us all on our toes, fine tuned to the critisicism, needs and wishes of the editors of the WIkimedia projects. As such I expect us to make sure that we do get as precise a picture as possible of what those are.
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l