This is more about checking consistency between projects. It is interesting, but not quite what I was asking about. It is very interesting if it would be possible to say something about half-life of an error. I'm pretty sure this follows number of page views if ordinary logged-in editing is removed.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 12:08 AM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi, Would checking if a date of death exists in articles be of interest to you. The idea is that Wikidata knows about dates of death and for "living people" the fact of a death should be the same in all projects. When the date of death is missing, there is either an issue at Wikidata (not the same precision is one) or at a project.
When a difference is found, the idea is that it is each projects responsibility to do what is needed. No further automation. Thanks, GerardM
On 15 April 2017 at 23:50, John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com wrote:
Are anyone doing any work on automated quality assurance of articles? Not the ORES-stuff, that is about creating hints from measured features. I'm thinking about verifying existence and completeness of citations, and structure of logical arguments.
John _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe