Tilman Bayer wrote:
Quarterly review minutes and/or slides of the following teams have been posted in recent days:
Multimedia: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarte rly_reviews/Multimedia/January_2015
Legal & Community Advocacy: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LCA_Q2_Slides.pdf (abridged slides only)
Fundraising and Fundraising Tech: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarte rly_reviews/Fundraising/January_2015
Communications: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Communications_WMF_Quarterly_Revie w,_Q2_2014-15.pdf (slides only, as a report - no actual meeting took place)
Hi.
I'm trying to understand why certain groups seem to have had a formal quarterly review (with minutes on a corresponding Meta-Wiki page) and why others seem to have bypassed this process. Why wasn't there a review for two of the four groups mentioned (Communications and Legal & Community Advocacy)? Publishing slides is better than nothing, I suppose, but it seems strange to not hold a formal quarterly review for these two teams.
MZMcBride