So, does this have any bearing on the discussion? - http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/06/us/nsa-foils-much-internet-encryption.html
Or are we just partial to the US surveillance over PRC.
The article does mention SSL, VPNs and 4G security. They even have a "Key recovery service" and it's been going on for a long while apparently, to the point that the NSA has been steering the release of encryption standards and tools. I suppose that should make the "politics of encryption" a bit less relevant?
-Theo
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Brion Vibber bvibber@wikimedia.org wrote:
I would love to see Wikipedia content made available in China on Chinese infrastructure operated by a Chinese organization, with total ability to determine their own security and censorship policies.
"But that's what Baidu did and we hate them!" you say?
We could work *with* such an organization to coordinate, share content, etc, without compromising basic web security for our sites or giving up
our
liberal content policies on Wikipedia "proper".
I don't buy the argument. Last time I checked, Hudong (now just "Baike") and Baidu Baike were the main wiki-like encyclopedias operating out of and serving mainland China. Both use non-free licensing terms, and both are subject to local censorship policies and practices. That may include turning over contributors if they post content that's deemed to be problematic by local authorities.
At least on the surface, the projects are successful, with millions of articles and lots of traffic. I have no idea what the quality of the content is, but looking at an article like DNA, I'm guessing it provides useful value to its readers:
http://www.baike.com/wiki/DNA&prd=button_doc_jinru
Where they are failing to do so, they can improve, if necessary by copying Wikipedia content. But the one thing that they _cannot_ provide, and that a neutral encyclopedia _must_ provide, is precisely information of the kind that the Chinese government would censor. Neutral information about people, politics and history, irrespective of whether that information afflicts a comfortable bureaucrat somewhere.
I would posit a different argument. The problem of providing basic information about any subject _is_ being solved for by local information providers. China isn't some backwater waiting for us to educate them about physics and disease control. The problem of providing a neutral, uncensored encyclopedia in the Chinese language, on the other hand, isn't being solved for by anyone but us. The answer is not to water down our security or partner with local information providers that allow censorship and are willing to turn over user data. It's to find ways to get that information to people, including the bits they'd rather have people not see.
Erik
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe