On 24/03/2008, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
You mean, hold a copyright via pseudonym or other agency and enforce it in the same manner until otherwise impossible, or completely anonymously? The first, of course, we do on Wikipedia every day. The issue with this seems to be no assertion of copyright or traceability to discover if its owed, rather than an anonymously asserted claim.
Anonymously, not pseudonymously. If it's just pseudonymous, you can plausibly prove that it's your pseudonym (might be difficult, but not impossible). If it's completely anonymous, there's no way you can prove it's yours.
It doesn't really matter if it's anonymous by intent or not, either way you can't prove it's yours.