Jacob and the rest of the legal team.
Many thanks for your clarifications on the "private information" versus "off Wikipedia information" issue.
Also it is excellent to see your willingness to adjudicate on especially controversial cases.
Best James
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Jacob Rogers jrogers@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
As I mentioned in my email earlier this month, we've put together a longer statement regarding paid editing and how we see the balance of the communities' role and the role that WMF legal can play in these cases. We tried to address the concerns that people have raised to us, and explain when it's helpful to contact us to assist on a case. Of note, it does explain what actions we can take even in cases that don't involve the WMF trademarks.
You can find it here: Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikimedia_ Foundation_statement_on_paid_editing_and_outing
Best, Jacob --
Jacob Rogers Legal Counsel Wikimedia Foundation
NOTICE: This message might have confidential or legally privileged information in it. If you have received this message by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe