Thank you, but discussing how your site or any other specific site looked like in some year is an distraction.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:30 PM Shlomi Fish shlomif@shlomifish.org wrote:
Hi John!
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:47:21 +0100 John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com wrote:
Could we please update them with a slightly more up-to-date skin?
Take a look at our Norwegian competitor in the lexicon field. https://snl.no/kunstig_intelligens
I took a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page and it doesn't look anything like a geocities/etc. site from the 90s, and I feel it doesn't look bad.
For the record that was my site at around 1998 - https://old-1998-site.shlomifish.org/ and people complained enough that my current site looks like "[insert year here]" that I added a FAQ entry:
https://www.shlomifish.org/meta/FAQ/site_looks_old.xhtml
See https://everybootstrap.site/ for how many contemporary sites look like.
Someone on freenode told me he thinks plain black-on-white sites look great.
Regards,
ShlomiJohn Erling Blad /jeblad _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Shlomi Fish https://www.shlomifish.org/ https://www.shlomifish.org/lecture/C-and-CPP/bad-elements/
As it turns out, compiling a C program from more than 20 years ago is actually a lot easier than getting a Rails app from last year to work. — https://passy.svbtle.com/building-vim-from-1993-today
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .