On 15-04-01 03:58 PM, Pierre-Selim wrote:
This is only the beginning: next step is the measurement of cute pixels, encyclopedic pixels and amazing pixels.
That metric is all wrong, because it presumes that all pixels are equally valuable. Surely, you should be also assigning weights to pixels depending on how much information they carry - background pixels out of the FOV aren't worth as much!
Also, some historic pixels may be worth several newer ones. Pixel valuation is an art as much as it is a science.
-- Marc
Ouais bon, poisson d'avril? :-)