On 4/19/07, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonavaro@gmail.com wrote:
So, speaking as an insignificant member or the community, I would ask all the members of the board, speak out openly in support of the chair, if you do infact support the direction she is proposing; do not just play whack-a-mole with trolls.
:-) Fair comment.
First, about the disclaimer. I also have a position as Executive Secretary. Sometimes I've used this for official announcements (such as job positions or resolutions); this is when I leave the disclaimer off. Otherwise I am speaking in a personal capacity, not for the WMF or the whole Board.
Yes, I support - as a member of the Board - the direction Florence is taking in thinking about governance of the WMF. As I pointed out earlier, I think that this reflects, for the most part, discussions that have taken place earlier about the role of the Board and the ED, though it does put them into a more formal framework. I'm thinking about some pages Florence put on our BoardWiki to see where this framework might break. I'm not a great fan of following fixed models (must .. question .. everything), so I'm likely going to challenge some of the specifics.
I also have to rethink my own proposals on committee reform in light of Florence's proposal, but I think our ideas are largely in line. Essentially, we want to work towards more dynamic workgroups under the control of staff. We haven't had many opportunities to discuss the whole committee situation yet, for various reasons that I won't get into. I do think we've made some progress in becoming more participatory: - Sandra has opened up the ComCom by creating a separate, more participatory, open communications group. - Internal Wiki / List have a proper access request procedure now and many new people have been added recently. - ChapCom has made draft bylaws of new chapters available publicly (I believe they weren't before)
Cary has been a bit overwhelmed by OTRS and general office work, but I hope we can get him started on some exciting large scale experiments in volunteerism soon.
The main problem child, in my view, is the SP-COM, which is supposed to handle all the exciting project partnerships. There is a lack of management capacity in the WMF, however, that could follow up on ideas our volunteers come up with, so we also need to solve that problem.
On transparency, we could certainly do a lot more, but I'm not sure that more mailing list posts are the answer. One thing that I hope for is that more Board members will join Planet Wikimedia, and that this will also become an important way for us to keep the community informed:
http://en.planet.wikimedia.org/
I've admittedly not used it as such yet, but I will do so next time something important comes up. We could also have a sub-planet specifically for WMF Board & Staff members.
There are many other ideas. It was always clear to me that we could only make limited progress until my brief term ends, and I hope that I and my fellow Board members will be given the opportunity to continue to do our best to improve WMF.