Am 16.09.2011 22:53, schrieb Stephen Bain:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Andre Engelsandreengels@gmail.com wrote:
I'd say, drop the idea that the filter is supposed to be perfect. A filter that is little-used can get a rough content first time around, preferably specified by the person asking for the filter, then people using the filter can suggest adding or removing images. Volunteers can go and work on the filters if they want, but if they don't, the filter will just be changed by such suggestions.
Indeed. I think some of the problems some people are predicting have been drastically exaggerated.
As long as the option to hide all images is also implemented, we can quite simply add a disclaimer when anyone goes to turn on a filter indicating that if complete exclusion is particularly important to them, they should choose the option to hide everything by default.
Would we do that for text as well? Where is the fundamental difference between text and images? Both can be objectionable or offending to some readers/viewers. Is there a real difference?
Wouldn't be a simple button to hide all images be enough to reach our goal, without the need to introduce categories?