Thank you for enabling it again. I had read about the blind tests in < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Article_feedback/Quality_assessment... before but I see some major changes in the graphs, which are a bit hard to understand.
- In "Daily moderation actions (percentage)" there's a huge spike of
helpful/unhelpful after C (July), did those flags even exist before? Or did helpfulness increase after wider usage according to the finding «the average page receives higher quality feedback than pages picked for their popularity/controversial topic»? (There's no change between 5 and 10 % though.)
*They did; the spike is most probably caused by a deployment from 0.6 percent of articles to 5 percent of articles, with a resulting "ooh, shiny! Lets take a look" reaction.
2) "Unique daily articles with feedback moderated" shows a spike and then a
stabilization, but I don't know what the graphs actually is about. For instance, can feedback be moderated per article ("feedback semi/full protection" or so) or only per item, etc. Do you know if moderation happens on the same articles and if stricter moderation increases helpfulness of feedback also on non-moderated articles?
*So, I *believe* it means "the number of distinct articles which have had feedback moderated that day", regardless of whether people use the article-specific page or the centralised page, but I'm not sure - some clarification from Dario would be awesome :). Ditto your other questions, particularly on the distribution of articles.
Nemo
______________________________**_________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.**org Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l