Andreas,
Unless you have specific evidence that Susanna has been specifically involved with anything untoward, you are smearing with guilt by association and creating your own chilling effect, and you would owe Susanna a retraction and apology.
Cheers, Craig Franklin
On 3 March 2016 at 09:15, Andreas Kolbe jayen466@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter putevod@mccme.ru wrote:
Susanna is (or was) a researcher, and every researcher in Armenia is a state employee. There are just no non-governmental organizations who
employ
researchers.
I do think there is a problem with a potential Armenian board member
(that
is, Turkish and Azeri Wikimedians would basically consider board as not legitimate), but I do not think the fact that she is or was employed by
the
Academy of Sciences is in any way problematic.
Cheers Yaroslav
Yaroslav,
In and of itself, the fact that Susanna is a government employee doesn't worry me either. Present WMF board member Alice Wiegand is a government employee too, if you will (she works as an aide to the mayor of a small town in Germany, according to her write-up on the WMF website).
The difference between Alice's situation and Susanna's is that the Armenian president turned up for the opening of the Wikimedia Armenia office in Yerevan.[1] The German president, in contrast, has probably never even heard of Alice. He certainly didn't attend when Wikimedia Germany was launched, nor did he have members of his cabinet tell the German public on national TV that it was their duty to edit the German Wikipedia.
The Armenian Wikipedia initiative is a matter of direct and personal interest to the President and government ministers of Armenia, a country that suppresses political dissent. It is impossible to escape the conclusion that the initiative is directed by them. This will be crystal clear to anyone in Armenia who has watched the YouTube video:[2] the Armenian Wikipedia will be perceived as a project of the Armenian government.
The chilling effect on opposition sympathisers and dissidents who might otherwise like to participate in an open encyclopedia project is monstrous. The likelihood that the Armenian Wikipedia will flourish under such circumstances and develop into a politically neutral reference work is nil.
I don't know Susanna, and in fact until yesterday had never heard of her. She may well be a delightful and charming person with a genuine enthusiasm for open knowledge. There are after all many encyclopedic topics that have no political sensitivity or relevance at all. But she is clearly part of a government-sponsored effort to control the Armenian Wikipedia.
Does it make sense to you that we cheer when Wikipedians stand up to the government in France, which is a fairly democratic and open country, and cheer equally when far more repressive regimes than that of France take such an intense interest in their national-language Wikipedia?
What would you say if Putin started to endorse Wikimedia Russia and attended its events, and members of his cabinet told the public to edit Wikipedia as part of their civic duty?
Andreas
[1]
http://www.armradio.am/en/2015/06/19/president-sargsyan-attends-opening-of-w... [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zazVM3ldIuw _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe