On 21 February 2010 10:30, Tomasz Ganicz polimerek@gmail.com wrote:
2010/2/21 Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net:
Anthony wrote:
Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
Do we agree with the idea, that at that time everything uploaded was under GNU FDL or not
Definitely not. You were supposed to release uploads under the GFDL, *if you were the copyright owner*, but not everything that was uploaded was under GFDL.
But in case of those uploads the copyright owners (authors of the logos) uploaded them personally. The funny part of that story is that it means that current Wikimedia logo seems to be under GFDL :-)
Nope. Nothing in the upload form on meta at that point mentioned the GFDL. So not GFDL. The GFDL-presumed templated that people seem to be using was killed off on en back in early 2009.