Definitly part of the overall quality. I wonder, do you have any stats om how much positive change the previous attempts have triggered?
Den man. 17. apr. 2017, 02.04 skrev Leila Zia leila@wikimedia.org:
Hi John,
This may be of interest to you:
We are working on building recommendation systems than can help editors identify how to expand already existing articles in Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to identifying what sections are missing from an article, what citations, what images, infobox information, etc. This is research in its early days, if you'd like to follow up with it please visit
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Expanding_Wikipedia_stubs_across_la...
Best, Leila
Leila Zia Senior Research Scientist Wikimedia Foundation
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:50 PM, John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com wrote:
Are anyone doing any work on automated quality assurance of articles? Not the ORES-stuff, that is about creating hints from measured features. I'm thinking about verifying existence and completeness of citations, and structure of logical arguments.
John _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe