There was already a discussion on this list and its privacy: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Affiliates_Network#Mailing_li... https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Affiliates_Network#Mailing_list_request_for_comment
I suggest building on that rather than starting a whole new one.
-greg
On Oct 19, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Keegan Peterzell keegan.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Gregory Varnum gregory.varnum@gmail.com wrote:
Chris - and I suspect others - who are already welcome to join this list - are why I think it is not a foregone conclusion that it will be kept private.
Remember that we have a diverse group of 80+ affiliates. It may in fact not be that the will of the ones who requested it represents the will of everyone. However, I am not personally comfortably declaring that on their behalf. I would prefer to allow them to discuss it and go from there.
-greg
I feel it's now time for the obligatory "Please discuss this on meta if we want to talk about transparency" post.
< https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_movement_affiliates/Affiliate...
-- ~Keegan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan
This is my personal email address. Everything sent from this email address is in a personal capacity. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe