That's most helpful, thank you both.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Pharos pharosofalexandria@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Ellie and Chris, this historical experience should be very helpful for future discussions!
Best, Pharos
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Chris Schilling <cschilling@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hey folks,
Ellie has put together a summarized budget including revenue and expenses from Wikimania 2014 in London[1] and Wikimania 2015[2], which I've gone ahead and posted to the summary pages of these conferences on meta.
Thanks,
Chris
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2014 [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2015
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Samuel Klein meta.sj@gmail.com wrote:
Itzik writes:
If we want to talk about the cost of Wikimania it will be great if
the
WMF and the local team will share the costs.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2014/Budget https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2015/Budget Maybe I missed something, but it's strange that such discussion takes
place without a real budget breakdown.
To summarize 2 huge event to "1$ million USD" does not make sense.
Agreed 1million%. It would be important to see a rough cost
breakdown, &
compare that to the best-budgeted Wikimanias.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Tomasz Ganicz polimerek@gmail.com wrote:
2016-02-10 6:06 GMT+01:00 Samuel Klein meta.sj@gmail.com:
FUDCons
Also it is hard to compare Wikimanias with FUDCons as it is a) much smaller (usually bo more than 200 attendees) b) divided by regions - for example in 2015 there were 3 FUDCons (Argentina, India, Spain) and 2 Flocks (NY and Kraków) - so they are rather like our Iberecop or CEE meetings than the global conferences.
Thanks. Similar to regional events perhaps, not Wikimania. Still
worth
comparing budgets perhaps, if available.
But I was wondering about the trend over time: whether extensive
funding
during the RedHat days made the events less useful, in the years after
that
funding was reduced.
And also Fedora developers have many potential sources of external
funding
- mainly from IT companies which uses free software and want to apply
for
their specific needs and for whom they quite often work.
True. But attendees to GLAM or education conferences also tend to have many potential sources of funding - mainly from archives or educational
or
technical companies who curate knowledge or develop education tools.
And
we
have IT industry partners who are similarly willing to support
Wikimanias.
Not entirely dissimilar.
But anyway, Fedora offers scholarships for attendees, see:
Yes, wiki conferences should as well - that part of conference funding
is
important. Even early Wikimanias with almost no WMF support had significant scholarship pools.
S _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- Chris "Jethro" Schilling I JethroBT (WMF) https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:I_JethroBT_(WMF) Community Organizer, Wikimedia Foundation https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe