In my mind when I wrote it, it doesn't limit anything. Now my wording can be improved if it's unclear or ambiguous. Villy
----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthere" anthere9@yahoo.com To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" foundation-l@wikimedia.org Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 3:21 PM Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright issues of wikimedia projects
--- Jean-Christophe Chazalette jean-christophe.chazalette@laposte.net wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthere" anthere9@yahoo.com To: foundation-l@wikimedia.org Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:05 PM Subject: [Foundation-l] Copyright issues of wikimedia projects
I guess this is my last attempt to talk about copyright issues in this place before deciding
that
- copyright discussions are obviously not
interesting
*anyone* here, so are not worth trying to be
discussed
since it raises absolutely no interest whatsoever
- or that are not to be discussed in any other
place
than on the english wikipedia list (see Tomos discussion about changing our copyright license, discussion that is occuring in another place, with
the
idea that all wikipedias would follow the english rules afterwards)
So, I'll ask just another time to be certain.
I must say that I am currently very disappointed
by
lack of cooperation on the matter, because I do
not
think my question is very difficult for those
working
in the wikimedia projects other than wikipedia.
We are setting the foundation status. The current status are indicating that ALL OF OUR CONTENTS (wikimedia projects) will be distributed under the gfdl license.
It doesn't say that, ant :
"WF have contents which are not protected by the provisions regulating the the intellectual property, if such is the case freely distributed under the conditions of a free licence of documentation of the type of the Free Documentation License written by Free Software Foundation Inc, and in particular its European branch with http://www.fsfeurope.org/"
No classical copyright, and a possibility of *a* free licence *of the type* of GFDL. So that I can't see how it would be possibly wider. Did we read the same text ? :-)
villy
We read the same text but do not understand it the same way. Does this allow contents under public domain, does it allow contents over other types of free licenses, does it allow contents under fair use and so on ?
In short, does it limit our future abilities to distribute content depending on future choices ?
Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l