On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Tobias Oelgarte < tobias.oelgarte@googlemail.com> wrote:
Am 18.06.2012 16:31, schrieb Thomas Morton:
We don't have much data on what our readers want; but a not insignificant
portion of them, at least, are concerned with controversial images
(nudity, Mohammed, etc.). I fully advocate finding out what the community thinks; but when I raised this issue before it was snorted at with something along the lines of "the readers aren't the driving force here".
*sigh*
I asked for the same thing and got no response as well. We had the
referendum which had big flaws,[1] but not a single neutral survey directed at the readers under the light that our community is most likely biased...
[1] explained in length at http://meta.wikimedia.org/** wiki/Talk:Image_filter_**referendum/enhttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Image_filter_referendum/en
That's one point we seem to agree on. I asked the same question a year ago – why did nobody survey the reading public, or the donors?
A