On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:21 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Not really. For example our need for portraits of people we have articles on means that we should have several hundred thousand images of faces.
In addition most parts of the human anatomy don't have the same providence issues.
Oh yeah, we humans tend to use faces as the way to recognise different
people... maybe genitalia are appropriate to distinguish between porn actors ;) (please do not take this sentence as an incentive to upload these kind of images, I think the set we have already covers all our encyclopedic needs)
Cruccone