On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Fæ faewik@gmail.com wrote:
This is not the first time that Erik has been sarcastic and rude in an apparent attempt to close down discussion in public responses to whistle-blowers.
Please. You are making a mockery of every whistleblower on the planet; it's disgraceful. Russavia's original post cites examples such as editing about a coffeeshop or a school. They're frivolous examples, pointless, trollish, part of a sequence of behavior to mix the occasional legitimate concern with wild insinuations and conjecture. You tend to join these types of threads with cheerful and seemingly limitless energy to attempt to whip up tiny shitstorms. This has turned far too many conversations into the Fae/Russavia traveling circus, with both of you demanding individual explanations from the Board for why someone pooped.
I have a ton of respect for Pete and I'm not discounting the merits of a conversation about how such editing should be handled, but I am cautioning very strongly against overreacting, because it can introduce very pernicious long term effects into our movement.
Erik