On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Fred Bauder fredbaud@fairpoint.net wrote:
On 18 November 2010 21:28, John Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Keegan Peterzell keegan.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
It looks to me like they just get paid to get volunteers to work. Â Nice scheme. Â So it's not technically paid editing :)
That sounds similar to the role of a few WMF staff...
Someone on another list discussing this suggested the WMF marketing monitoring the article about you as a service ...
Which list is this?
So we would charge people to monitor the article about them? Would we do that for firms too? There would could be negligence liability if we miss something.
'monitoring' =/= 'action'
It would be easy to build an RSS feed for a set of articles and 'give' that to any fool willing to pay for it.
-- John Vandenberg