How many months/years do you believe is a realistic expectation?
Birgitte SB
--- GerardM gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, Most of the developers are volunteers. There is certainly too much work in the first place. It is a stellar performance what so few people do with so little investment.
Their first priority is to keep the servers operational, combine this with the growth that we experience this is a big job. There are several big jobs that have been postponed time and again for many many months (think single login or the inclusion of software that has been programmed and is waiting for inclusion in the software).
When you find yourself a developer to program for you, it does not mean that the software will be accepted; the only thing achieved is that you are closer to getting it accepted. This is not to say that Bugzilla is busted, it is that your expectations are not compatible with reality.
PS when you expect developers to reply to your wishes, you have to realise that that too is work..
Thanks, GerardM
On 9/23/06, Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com wrote:
The subject line pretty much sums this note up. I
am
frustrated with the continued lack of development support for anything where the propents are not actually developers themselves. I have aware for sometime that asking for anything without
uploading a
"patch" is absolutely useless. So I accepted
people
that don't know what a patch is are just screwed.
But
I have recently realized many of developments
which
have never happened *did* have attachments (which
I
think are "patches"). The bugzilla system really
must
be broken. Because how can these things just be ignored for so long? Here is the bug which had
the
most effort invested in it from WS.
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4375
This feature was so desired by people Wikisource a show of support by 15 separte languages was orchestrated hoping it would have some effect.
http://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Vote_on_enabling_the_ProtectSection_ex...
This was back in January. Nothing ever happened.
The
underlying problem this feature would solve will
now
hopefully be able to be addressed by "Stable
version".
At least I hope "stable versions" will be
workable.
But the last email about how de.WP wants a much
more
complicated system for this worries me.
There are other technical issues that have
projects on
WS at a standstill.
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5881
I ask people online. Bugs are filed. Nothing happens. I do not want to make the effort to get
all
sub-domains to show support for these new features when it will have no effect. I realize that the developers are volunteers and are able to chose
what
interests them and where they would like to work.
But
they do not even give any feedback or even tell us they will not help us and we should learn to live without it. We just wait month upon month hoping
it
is on someone's to-do list somewhere. It is
beyond
frustrating. Has anyone else experienced these problems?
Birgitte SB
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com