On 05/01/2008, effe iets anders effeietsanders@gmail.com wrote:
Guys, please,
The language is just a mere practical matter. Please let's first come to the conclusion what the *purpose* would be of this meta-arbcom *before* we even start with discussing issues like this. i know it is very easy to get into details, but let's remain focussed. Does anyone have a good proposal for which topics the arbcom should be used and what type of members we would need?
It's a practical matter, but I don't think it's a "mere" one. It is a very important issue that needs to be resolved. What kind of cases the committee will consider is also an important issue, but there's no reason we can't discuss them both.