Lodewijk, What I asked for is: do we understand what the impact was of the Wikipedia Zero project. In the answer of James, a board member of the WMF someone who could know, there is nothing that answers that question. All the answer does is deflect the question to something else. A notion that it is "not that bad because we have these other things". These things we had before Wikipedia Zero, they are not Wikipedia and they do not scale.
What I have noticed is that once consensus has been reached, we do not want to be confronted with the consequences of our actions. Wikipedia Zero has damaged our outreach and what the BBC info reminds us of is that Internet, the cost of Internet, is not comparable in Africa with what we are used to. It means that we no longer reach the girls and boys in Soweto as we showed in our film clip at the Erasmus award.
We do not cover Africa properly, we do not need to seek consensus about this, that is easily to be shown. Our focus on outreach is in America, then Europe, then the rest of the world and there is Africa. From the moment we stopped Wikipedia Zero, we have invested heavily in infrastructure in Africa, the organisational presence in the USA is now such that it rivals Wikimania and is used as an excuse by some to even dismantle Wikimania. As an organisation, a movement the "centre periphery" model is alive and well. We happily embrace Burke's peerage in Wikidata and we balk at the fact that covering science takes resources away from pet projects.
You tell me to be constructive and here I lay out what the situation is. How can you be constructive as our movement does not support science, the people who need our information most are disenfranchised because we do not cover them, support them in an equal manner. Thanks,
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 04:31, effe iets anders effeietsanders@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Gerard,
It would be great if you could keep a slightly more constructive tone in your messages. On one hand, you seem genuinely interested to help access to free knowledge in Africa, but in your second email, you seem to jump (after one response) to conclusions already. If you like to get real responses to your emails, you may want to try a more constructive attitude. For me, it is at least sufficiently offputting to disengage (I removed the rest of my response/suggestions).
-- Lodewijk
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 9:34 PM Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi, Kiwix and off line Wikipedia did exist at the start of Wikipedia Zero.
It
is great that you brought some to Africa but you do not scale and it is
not
a study into the effects of what the effects are of terminating Wikipedia Zero.
No idea what "Starlink" is
https://lmgtfy.com/?q=starlink&s=l
but it is not a reality for a few more years.. It sounds like we have thrown all these kids under the bus but hey, we
have
plan. A plan/action is having our own caches in Africa and providing edit and read capabilities for all who care to use it... and then measure the extend it helps us recover from our Wikipedia Zero public. Thanks, GerardM
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 02:48, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
We have offline Wikipedia. I have shipped devices to Kinshasa, and they arrived :-)
Of course they do not at all address the need for two way
communication.
I am hoping Starlink will help when it comes online in a few years.
James
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:19 AM Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The BBC shows how dramatically expensive internet is in Africa.. For
in
my
opinion local political reasons Wikipedia Zero has terminated. That
is
ok
up to a point; the point being that we understand the consequences
from
this action.
Given that our data is NOT local, people have to pay a premium. What
are
we
going to do to compensate for expensive Wikipedia that replaced
Wikipedia
Zero? Did we study the effects or are we not interested in the
consequences
of our actions? Thanks, GerardM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-50516888 _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe