On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 09:36:52PM -0500, Casey Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Brian Salter-Duke b_duke@bigpond.com.au wrote:
Yes, I missed the point about "any" project. However how is a user from Simple who hears about the closure of their project to know that when they go there to give their opinion, they have to prove their standing in the community? I think this is just another example of how remote Meta is for the average editor on other projects.
Most of them time, it's noted in the SiteNotice, the main page, and/or the main discussion page. (This is what's normally/should be done for the smaller wikis, at least.)
Well in this case I'm missing it. Also, I do not know whether I am odd, but I hardly ever look at the main page, the community portal, etc on any of the projects I work on.
Now on simple at:-
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_Portal
there is:-
Proposal for closure A proposal to close Simple English Wikipedia has been made.
The first line is a link to the discussion on meta.
I have not come across any other mention of this discussion on simple and no mention of having to have 100 edits on other projects to participate in the discussion on meta. How is the poor editor on simple to know this, if s/he does not visit meta normally?
What am I missing?
Brian.
-- Casey Brown Cbrown1023
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to this address will probably get lost.