On 6/20/05, Ilya Haykinson haykinson@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/20/05, Aphaia aphaia@gmail.com wrote:
... Honestly I can't figure an organisation which department or internal team has their own logos and don't use the organisation logo itself. ...
I absolutely love the logo. It gives the people who discuss research
Not just the concept of a logo? You love... that... logo?
Everyone can start dressing alike now. People on the Contingency Team should wear nothing but hunter's orange for the next three months, until the first five-year-plan is safely underway (and under six feet of concrete). And you must refer to your significant others as "mankind's last hope."
With thousands of wikimedians, having a subset of them create a sense of group (or purpose) identity is well worth the trouble.
Right.
Additionally, any designer will tell you that a consistent graphical language is important in building and maintaining a brand.
More reason not to mutate it. Brand is sacred.
SJ
"NEVER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD ANYTHING POKE THE PILLSBURY DOUGHBOY BELOW HIS WAIST"