On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 at 21:52 +0000, sannse wrote:
(Appologies if this comes through twice - I have concerns about my e-mail service)
I feel very strongly that we should not change the rules after the election. We voted for two board members and we have two. If it's decided that we need another then we should vote again. There is every possibility that the results will change with the changed situation - for example, it's been pointed out that many people felt that there should be a non-en. board member. As Anthere is a member already this may influence votes. I for one think that a U.S. user representative would be a balance in the current board.
re-doing a vote just mean: "We don't like results so we redo a vote", I don't understand at all the purpose of this thread. Can someone clarify where is really the problem ?
regards, Philippe Elie