Hoi, Pine, I would like so many things.. I expect that SUL and more goodliness from this will be a requirement. For me there is urgency in having a discussion system that works for mobiles and templates...
Once we have that we either have other priorities or it is a really good idea to be implemented while developers know Flow intimately well.. Thanks, GerardM
On 8 September 2014 09:46, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
A problem that I would like Flow to solve is the high amount of labor needed to read over a dozen pages across four wikis in order for the reader to access most of the MediaViewer discussions.
Pine On Sep 8, 2014 12:22 AM, "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 September 2014 05:46, John Mark Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com
wrote:
If it is good software, the projects will *ask* for it to be deployed, like they did with LiquidThreads, and users will want to use it on their user talk even if the wider community isnt ready to migrate.
This is the key point.
Those of us who presently use talk pages to get the work done. What is going to make us *love* Flow, for all its imperfections, and demand to have it for ourselves? What's Flow's killer feature for us?
(I asked this before.)
- d.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe