On 13-Oct-10 13:32, David Gerard wrote:
On 13 October 2010 11:19, Gutza gutza@moongate.ro wrote:
Nobody says the current content should be deleted -- just stop serving it.
Here you are playing with language, not advancing the discussion. By "delete", the thread starter meant precisely "stop serving it."
No, I am not playing with words -- saying that something will be deleted implies a loss. I am contending that my proposal doesn't involve any loss: Mark's work invested in creating content would not be lost from the face of the Earth (because the content would be preserved in the database), and no Transnitrian would feel any loss from the fact that the content is no longer served, for the simple reason that such a hypothetical Transnitrian (i.e. one that would be interested in such a Wikipedia) doesn't exist for the time being. Whenever he/she will make their presence known, the current content will be restored, so there will be no loss at that point either.
Not at all the same thing as deleting the content.
Gutza