On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
What I'd ask the Board is this: what do you expect the impact of such a resolution (referring again specifically to the image content resolution) will be? By restating the ideology that the projects are not censored in one resolution, and merely "urging" a minimal standard of care in the other, is it not likely that the status quo will reign and we'll be in the same position years from now absent some other motivating event?
The important point is that it's not the role of the board to change the status quo of a specific project in dramatic ways-- it's their job to speak up for what they think the project should be doing.
Non-notable people shouldn't be shown on WM against their will- that isn't controversial. There are a lot of details to work out about when it's reasonable to infer consent and when it's not, but that's a debate for the leadership of Commons.
So long as a project stays within the law, doesn't grossly misuse their resources, and isn't "evil", it is free to make mistakes.
Alec