Something stating that _some_ content is from Wikinews would be more appropriate. At the moment, the Wikinews logo appears more prominently than the site's own logo, giving the impression that Wikinews has far more influence over the site than it does.
Angela.
Indeed, i dont mind having the logo on there somewhere, but it has to be clearer that we are not a sponser, and that we are not affiliated with thier POV. Something more like "Wikinews - content porvider" or something.
We should indeed try and provide those sites with ready-made logos such as (in bulk): -a Wikipedia logo that says : an article from Wikipedia -A Wikinews logo that says "Content provider" -A wikimedia logo that says "Official partner"
etc.
Delphine