I think it would be more productive to import the usability content into Meta, close down the usability wiki if it's served it's intended purpose, and continue the discussion at meta.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 6:35 AM, K. Peachey p858snake@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
The main page of the Usability wiki ( http://usability.wikimedia.org )
says
that it's discontinued and the whole wiki appears to be locked for
editing.
I don't remember this being discussed, although i may have missed it.
That was decided by the usability team, whom were the main users of that wiki, with plans to import the usable information (such as some of the extension documentation onto Mediawiki wiki).
...snip... I suggest unlocking the Usability wiki and re-opening it as a community
hub
for ideas about usability. It should be a completely unlocked wiki, with anonymous users allowed to edit etc.; if spam becomes a problem, editing
can
be allowed for registered users only.
I must disagree with that, fragmenting discussions all over the place just makes things worse, It would be much better to keep these discussions centralized on somewhere like Meta or Mediawiki wiki (or possibly Strategy as well) instead of scattering them onto obscure wikis where they don't have as much viewage.
-Peachey
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l