Daniel Mayer wrote:
Yes copyleft is what I was talking about. And for me it is a central part of what free content is. That's one of the reasons why I want to help create a GNU Free Content License. The FDL doesn't mention *content* as you rightly state - that is something that needs to be fixed.
I don't think it is something that needs to be "fixed". It's very deliberately left out, because the FSF, as detailed on their website (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Content) does not believe even using the word "content" fits with their goals, and would prefer its use died out entirely. If there were a "GNU Free Content License", *that* would be something that needed to be fixed.
I certainly don't see Wikimedia as producing "content".
-Mark