There is already a statistics page, http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/Index.html skype: node.ue
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:13 AM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 11/7/2009 11:28:13 PM Pacific Standard Time, gerard.meijssen@gmail.com writes:
Please read it as an appeal to reply to foundation-l in moderation. Please read it as an appeal to post liberally to this list as we do not have an alternative.>>
Speaking of self-moderation., a google search on Foundation-l "gerard meijssen" shows
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&
rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=7zN&num=50&q=foundation-l+%22gerard+Meijssen%22&lr=& aq=f&oq=&aqi=http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&%0Arls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=7zN&num=50&q=foundation-l+%22gerard+Meijssen%22&lr=&%0Aaq=f&oq=&aqi=
33,000 pages
Is there a way to create a chart showing how many messages each poster has posted to the list? Also Gerard I think if you're going to use an argument about the value of those people who *aren't* posting, we need to know who they are. Perhaps we don't want them to post either.
Until we get some hard facts on the issue, how is any decision supposed to be able to be reached?
W.J.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l