On 20 January 2015 at 18:23, Trillium Corsage trillium2014@yandex.com wrote:
Thank you for informing me my opinion is wrong, but I'd appreciate specific refutation next time. The answer "dig through the logs and archives" will find no doubt many criticisms of Russavia including from many rabid and shifty accusers and drama mongers, but won't tell one why the WMF acted. "Do some homework and figure it out yourself" is no answer for an 100 million dollar organization with scores of employees to say.
I'm not a 100 million dollar organisation but in any case we have further established that your interest is not in fact openness.
You seem to have misread what I said. In such a case, the WMF could advise the editor of all that privately,
No. Your problem is that you are assuming internal WMF communications are privileged (note this term has a very precise legal meaning and that is the way I'm using it).