On 11/10/2011 15:33, Kim Bruning wrote:
<flame on> Therefore you cannot claim that I am stating nonsense. The inverse is true: you do not possess the information to support your position, as you now admit. In future, before you set out to make claims of bad faith in others, it would be wise to ensure that your own information is impeccable first. </flame> sincerely, Kim Bruning
I claim that you are talking total crap. It is not *that* difficult to get the categories of an image and reject based on which categories the image is in are. There are enough people out there busily categorizing all the images already that any org that may wish to could block images that are in disapproved categories.
The problem, and it is a genuine problem, is that the fucking stupid images leak out across commons in unexpected ways. Lets assuime that an 6th grade class is asked to write a report on Queen Victoria, and a child serach commons for prince albert:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=pri...
If you at work you probably do not want to clicking the above link at all.