Even for the east end of London, I got some odd looks. Video was a but rubbish, but I tried!
Richard Symonds, Wikimedia UK On Jul 27, 2012 8:12 PM, "Stevie Benton" stevie.benton@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Sounds like you're prepared for some flash photography. Ahem. On Jul 27, 2012 8:08 PM, "Richard Symonds" < richard.symonds@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
I'm about to video the flypast, outside on the road in my dressing gown. Does that count as freedom of panorama? ;-)
Richard Symonds, Wikimedia UK On Jul 27, 2012 3:48 PM, wiki-list@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net
wrote:
I don't see that joint authorship enters into this at all. I think
it's safe
to assume that the one holding the camera is the one making the
creative
decisions about the photos.
Then continue to advise people that they are the sole owner of a photograph just because they clicked the shutter.
My advice is that the law isn't that simple, and that blanket statements of that type are quite often incorrect.
Suppose I take a photo of someone jumping over a hurdle. Most likely
I'd
alter the raw image somewhat. At least change the white balance, the
colour
saturation and mid grey point, but I might also change perspective,
clone
out some elements, blur other parts, maybe de-emphasis the colour is
some
other areas. The resulting image may be rather different to the image
that
was originally recorded.
Now asuppose that the I who takes the photo is not the same I that does the post-processing.
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l