A while ago I was brainstorming a bit and came up with a few ideas, some may be good and some may not (or not be feasible). I didn't read this whole thread so I might be repeating some ideas that have previously been mentioned as I came up with this stuff a long time ago. This is just some stuff I thought up in 10-15 minutes so they're not necessarily well thought out ideas but there might be some good ones lurking in there somewhere:
MediaWiki – platinum support? Support? Hosting service? Help corporations install mediawiki installations and help customize it to their needs (since they don't wanna do it themselves) meaning a hired dev (ie. Brion + someone else who could be hired as business expands, this is of course post-SUL as I suppose that's the most pressing issue at the moment) can develop (or modify) an extension\the mediawiki code specifically for that third party's use. The extension wouldn't be exclusively owned by the third party but rather released under a free license like the mediawiki code (at least I'm pretty sure that's under a free license).
· Amazon referral links – there are over 15,000 links on the English Wikipedia to amazon.com. Since they are already there, there's no reason not to append a referral to the link so the WMF gets some money every time someone buys something through that link. It's not extra advertising or anything of the sort as the amazon links are *already present*, this would just be better utilization of them for revenue purposes.
· Content – charge people and in return help them get copies of the databases, etc. the content is free but the bandwidth costs Wikimedia money and it should therefore be compensated for it (if not extra). Wikimedia could also possibly load the databases onto a new server for the other company that wants the content from wikipedia and have it all ready for actual use by that company.
· Help sites like answers.com outsource the whole mirroring Wikipedia business and leave it to Wikimedia (for a fee) – could be done much more efficiently and the articles on places like answers.com wouldn't get outdated so quickly.
· Start enforcing WMF's rights, see this search at walla.co.ilhttp://search.walla.co.il/?e=hew&q=%E2%27%E5%F8%E2%27%20%E1%E5%F9, walla show the Wikipedia logo (at least one of them which I believe is protected under trademark laws) and then redirect to wallapedia instead of redirecting to Wikipedia. They mislead people into thinking they're going to Wikipedia but instead the people are going to wallapedia where walla makes money off the ads (and in a way diverts potential donors away from Wikipedia)
-Yonatan
On 5/18/07, Florence Devouard Anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
<snip>
I expect there are other ways to make business and to collect some cash.
Which ones would you suggest ?
Each of these systems has advantage and drawbacks. I above mentionned the advertisement system, but there are others which might be controversial. For example, if we have wikipedia logo printed on a game of trivial pursuit, will you be happy, or not ? If Microsoft is Wikimania sponsor, will you be happy, or not ?
Community can very largely provide input here.
<snip>
Ant
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l