"even finding the glaring typo you saw in a reference is nearly impossible after you hit the edit button." -- Marc
Yes, it was, as references were getting longer and longer (almost to the point of including the author's likesa and deslikes and what he or she had for breakfast. That was 'solved' by the new <ref=.....>, that is really not the easiest to figure out. And oddly enough, I don't ever see anywhere any form of a tutorial on changes - such as the new ref method, hoveing footnotes, etc.
Other then clicking edit on another page to see how it is done, there is no gjuidance whatsoever.
Rui
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe