On 28/09/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
The procedure as it is evidently needs work, since other bidders (e.g. London) are disappointed at their hard work being pretty much wasted.
The current system seems to ensure a lot of volunteer time and effort being futile. This is damaging to the project.
The problem is that either we make a choice based on three or four groups who've invested a lot of effort - which guarantees wasting a fair lump of effort - or we make a choice before the detailed work has been done, which would mean we save the legwork of the other teams *but* we make a decision based on very little evidence. And if it then turns out that the really really really optomistic bid for Gothab isn't going to work once we start scaring up sponsorship etc, it's a bit late to select an alternative...
It strikes me that any competitive bidding process, where the actual work is devolved to a largely unknown local community, is going to require a degree of wasted effort as all communities bidding try to demonstrate they can achieve the required level. It's not ideal, but neither is it simple ineptitude... it's necessary.